CVE-2014-0130

Directory traversal vulnerability in actionpack/lib/abstract_controller/base.rb in the implicit-render implementation in Ruby on Rails before 3.2.18, 4.0.x before 4.0.5, and 4.1.x before 4.1.1, when certain route globbing configurations are enabled, allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a crafted request.

CVSS: 7.5Highscored by CISA
Exploited in the wild: Yes, in CISA KEV since 25 Mar 2022CISA deadline for US federal agencies: 15 Apr 2022unvetted proof-of-concept code on github
EPSS: 53.7%chance of exploitation in the next 30 daystop 1% of scored CVEsFIRST score of 11 Nov 2026
Fix: Patch availablesee the advisories in the references
Published: 7 May 2014analysed here 12 Nov 2026

Do first. Apply updates per vendor instructions. (CISA's required action for this KEV entry)

Summary

Triage

Attack surface: Server-side
Exploitable: At runtime
Attack vector: network
Weakness: CWE-22 Path Traversal
Can a WAF block it?: Yes. See why

The summary, impact and action text on this page are written by our AI analysis pipeline, or taken from the NVD description when a CVE was imported from NVD. They are not the vendor's wording: check them against the sources. A longer AI executive summary and technical analysis are generated for signed-in accounts on the Max plan.

Affected products

Products named in our analysis

redhat:subscription_asset_manager
redhat:enterprise_linux_server
rubyonrails:rails

Fix and mitigation

WAF and other mitigations

Can a WAF block it? Yes. Path traversal sends `../` sequences in the request, which WAF rules catch, including the common encodings.

Also consider: canonical path validation

Based on the weakness type only; no CVE-specific evidence yet. We check Cloudflare, AWS, Google Cloud Armor and Azure; for Akamai, Imperva, Fastly, F5, ask your vendor.

Remediation steps (AI-written)

Step-by-step remediation is generated for accounts on the Max plan, for CVEs that match a technology in their stack. Add this technology to your stack to see the fix checklist.

Exploitation evidence

CISA KEV catalog: Listed since 25 Mar 2022.
CISA due date: 15 Apr 2022, the remediation deadline for US federal agencies
CISA required action: Apply updates per vendor instructions.
Public exploit code: Unvetted proof-of-concept code on GitHub: 1 GitHub proof of concept
CISA SSVC: exploitation active, automatable no, technical impact totalAssessed by CISA 7 Feb 2025 (SSVC 2.0.3). Exploitation is none, poc (public proof of concept) or active.

GitHub proofs of concept

omarkurt/cve-2014-013018 stars

Listed so you can judge urgency, not as a recommendation to run anything. GitHub “proofs of concept” are unvetted: some are fake or carry malware. Exploit-DB marks the entries its staff verified.

Timeline

7 May 2014Published
8 May 2014First proof-of-concept repository on GitHub (unvetted)1 day later
25 Mar 2022Added to CISA KEV (exploited in the wild)2,878 days (about 8 years) later
15 Apr 2022CISA remediation due date (US federal agencies)21 days later
7 Feb 2025CISA SSVC assessment: exploitation active1,030 days (about 3 years) later
22 Oct 2025CVE record last updated256 days (about 9 months) later
12 Nov 2026Analysed by vulneraibility.com387 days (about 1 year) later

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Metric	Value	What it means
Attack vector	NetworkReachable over the internet or any routable network.	Reachable over the internet or any routable network.
Attack complexity	LowRepeatable attack, no special conditions.	Repeatable attack, no special conditions.
Privileges required	NoneThe attacker needs no prior access.	The attacker needs no prior access.
User interaction	NoneNo victim action needed.	No victim action needed.
Scope	UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.	Impact stays within the vulnerable component.
Confidentiality	HighTotal data disclosure possible.	Total data disclosure possible.
Integrity	NoneNo unauthorised modification.	No unauthorised modification.
Availability	NoneThe service stays up.	The service stays up.

Common questions

Is CVE-2014-0130 being exploited?

Yes. CVE-2014-0130 appears in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, which means exploitation in the wild has been confirmed and reported. Treat it as active rather than theoretical, and patch it ahead of higher-scoring vulnerabilities that carry no exploitation evidence.

How severe is CVE-2014-0130?

CVE-2014-0130 is rated High with a CVSS score of 7.5. Severity describes how bad exploitation would be, not how likely it is: pair it with exploitation evidence before deciding what to patch first.

Is there a patch for CVE-2014-0130?

Yes. A fix has been recorded for CVE-2014-0130. The vendor advisory is the authority on the exact fixed version — apply it from there rather than from a summary.

What does CVE-2014-0130 affect?

CVE-2014-0130 affects redhat:subscription_asset_manager, redhat:enterprise_linux_server, rubyonrails:rails. Confirm the exact affected versions against the vendor advisory before deciding you are exposed.

Exploitation status reflects CISA's KEV catalog as we last synced it. Check the catalog directly.

References

NVD CVE.org CVE Details Source

5 references in the CVE record, grouped by the tags the record gives them.

Advisories (1)

rhn.redhat.com /errata/RHSA-2014-1863.html

Where the data on this page comes from

CVE List (CVE.org): description, affected versions, references; CVE Terms of Use
NVD: CVSS and CPE data
CISA KEV catalog: exploitation, date added, due date
CISA Vulnrichment (ADP): SSVC decision points
FIRST EPSS: exploit probability and percentile
PoC-in-GitHub: GitHub repositories that claim a proof of concept

Summary, impact and triage tags: written by our AI analysis pipeline from the sources above. Check them against the sources.

Similar CVEs

Get CVEs like this by email. Join the free digest: the CVEs we flag as major, all CVSS 8.0 or higher, in up to three emails a day (sent at 05:00, 11:00 and 15:00 UTC). Matching alerts to the products you run needs an account, and accounts are invite-only during the beta.