CVE-2014-0160
Heartbleed
The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug.
- CVSS
- 7.5Highscored by CISA
- Exploited in the wild
- Yes, in CISA KEV since 4 May 2022CISA deadline for US federal agencies: 25 May 2022public exploit code
- EPSS
- > 99.9%chance of exploitation in the next 30 daystop 0.1% of scored CVEsFIRST score of 11 Nov 2026
- Fix
- Patch availablesee the advisories in the references
- Published
- 7 Apr 2014analysed here 12 Nov 2026
Do first. Apply updates per vendor instructions. (CISA's required action for this KEV entry)
Summary
Triage
The summary, impact and action text on this page are written by our AI analysis pipeline, or taken from the NVD description when a CVE was imported from NVD. They are not the vendor's wording: check them against the sources. A longer AI executive summary and technical analysis are generated for signed-in accounts on the Max plan.
Affected products
Products named in our analysis
- openssl:openssl
- filezilla-project:filezilla_server
- siemens:application_processing_engine_firmware
- siemens:cp_1543-1_firmware
- siemens:simatic_s7-1500_firmware
- siemens:simatic_s7-1500t_firmware
- siemens:elan-8.2
- siemens:wincc_open_architecture
- intellian:v100_firmware
- intellian:v60_firmware
- mitel:micollab
- mitel:mivoice
- opensuse:opensuse
- canonical:ubuntu_linux
- fedoraproject:fedora
- redhat:gluster_storage
- redhat:storage
- redhat:virtualization
- redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop
- redhat:enterprise_linux_server
- redhat:enterprise_linux_server_aus
- redhat:enterprise_linux_server_eus
- redhat:enterprise_linux_server_tus
- redhat:enterprise_linux_workstation
- debian:debian_linux
- ricon:s9922l_firmware
- broadcom:symantec_messaging_gateway
- splunk:splunk
Fix and mitigation
WAF and other mitigations
Can a WAF block it? No. This is an out-of-bounds read. Generic WAF rules do not recognise the input that triggers it; only a rule written for this specific CVE can, and only if the triggering request has a recognisable shape.
Also consider: patch
Based on the weakness type only; no CVE-specific evidence yet. We check Cloudflare, AWS, Google Cloud Armor and Azure; for Akamai, Imperva, Fastly, F5, ask your vendor.
Remediation steps (AI-written)
Step-by-step remediation is generated for accounts on the Max plan, for CVEs that match a technology in their stack. Add this technology to your stack to see the fix checklist.
Exploitation evidence
- CISA KEV catalog
- Listed since 4 May 2022.
- CISA due date
- 25 May 2022, the remediation deadline for US federal agencies
- CISA required action
- Apply updates per vendor instructions.
- Public exploit code
- Yes: 4 on Exploit-DB · 2 Metasploit modules · 75 GitHub proofs of concept
- CISA SSVC
- exploitation active, automatable yes, technical impact partialAssessed by CISA 7 Feb 2025 (SSVC 2.0.3). Exploitation is none, poc (public proof of concept) or active.
Exploit-DB
- OpenSSL TLS Heartbeat Extension - 'Heartbleed' Information Leak (2) (DTLS Support)remote, 24 Apr 2014, verified by Exploit-DB
- OpenSSL TLS Heartbeat Extension - 'Heartbleed' Information Leak (1)remote, 10 Apr 2014, verified by Exploit-DB
- OpenSSL 1.0.1f TLS Heartbeat Extension - 'Heartbleed' Memory Disclosure (Multiple SSL/TLS Versions)remote, 9 Apr 2014, verified by Exploit-DB
- OpenSSL TLS Heartbeat Extension - 'Heartbleed' Memory Disclosureremote, 8 Apr 2014, verified by Exploit-DB
Metasploit
- auxiliary/scanner/ssl/openssl_heartbleedauxiliary, rank normal
- auxiliary/server/openssl_heartbeat_client_memoryauxiliary, rank normal
GitHub proofs of concept
- FiloSottile/Heartbleed2,369 stars
- musalbas/heartbleed-masstest571 stars
- titanous/heartbleeder452 stars
- Lekensteyn/pacemaker331 stars
and 71 more repositories
Listed so you can judge urgency, not as a recommendation to run anything. GitHub “proofs of concept” are unvetted: some are fake or carry malware. Exploit-DB marks the entries its staff verified.
Timeline
- 7 Apr 2014First public exploit or proof of concept
- 7 Apr 2014Published1 day later
- 4 May 2022Added to CISA KEV (exploited in the wild)2,948 days (about 8 years) later
- 25 May 2022CISA remediation due date (US federal agencies)21 days later
- 7 Feb 2025CISA SSVC assessment: exploitation active990 days (about 3 years) later
- 22 Oct 2025CVE record last updated256 days (about 9 months) later
- 12 Nov 2026Analysed by vulneraibility.com387 days (about 1 year) later
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
| Metric | Value | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Attack vector | NetworkReachable over the internet or any routable network. | Reachable over the internet or any routable network. |
| Attack complexity | LowRepeatable attack, no special conditions. | Repeatable attack, no special conditions. |
| Privileges required | NoneThe attacker needs no prior access. | The attacker needs no prior access. |
| User interaction | NoneNo victim action needed. | No victim action needed. |
| Scope | UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component. | Impact stays within the vulnerable component. |
| Confidentiality | HighTotal data disclosure possible. | Total data disclosure possible. |
| Integrity | NoneNo unauthorised modification. | No unauthorised modification. |
| Availability | NoneThe service stays up. | The service stays up. |
Common questions
Is CVE-2014-0160 being exploited?
Yes. CVE-2014-0160 appears in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, which means exploitation in the wild has been confirmed and reported. Treat it as active rather than theoretical, and patch it ahead of higher-scoring vulnerabilities that carry no exploitation evidence.
How severe is CVE-2014-0160?
CVE-2014-0160 is rated High with a CVSS score of 7.5. Severity describes how bad exploitation would be, not how likely it is: pair it with exploitation evidence before deciding what to patch first.
Is there a patch for CVE-2014-0160?
Yes. A fix has been recorded for CVE-2014-0160. The vendor advisory is the authority on the exact fixed version — apply it from there rather than from a summary.
What does CVE-2014-0160 affect?
CVE-2014-0160 affects openssl:openssl, filezilla-project:filezilla_server, siemens:application_processing_engine_firmware, siemens:cp_1543-1_firmware, and 24 further products or versions. Confirm the exact affected versions against the vendor advisory before deciding you are exposed.
Exploitation status reflects CISA's KEV catalog as we last synced it. Check the catalog directly.
References
50 references in the CVE record, grouped by the tags the record gives them.
Advisories (27)
- debian.org /security/2014/dsa-2896
- marc.info /?l=bugtraq&m=139774054614965&w=2
- marc.info /?l=bugtraq&m=139889113431619&w=2
- rhn.redhat.com /errata/RHSA-2014-0396.html
- marc.info /?l=bugtraq&m=139835815211508&w=2
- marc.info /?l=bugtraq&m=141287864628122&w=2
Show 21 more
- kb.cert.org /vuls/id/720951
- marc.info /?l=bugtraq&m=139905295427946&w=2
- marc.info /?l=bugtraq&m=139833395230364&w=2
- lists.opensuse.org /opensuse-security-announce/2014-04/msg00004.html
- marc.info /?l=bugtraq&m=142660345230545&w=2
- marc.info /?l=bugtraq&m=140724451518351&w=2
- secunia.com /advisories/57836
- marc.info /?l=bugtraq&m=139808058921905&w=2
- marc.info /?l=bugtraq&m=139758572430452&w=2
- marc.info /?l=bugtraq&m=139843768401936&w=2
- secunia.com /advisories/57483
- tools.cisco.com /security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20140409-heartbleed
- marc.info /?l=bugtraq&m=140075368411126&w=2
- marc.info /?l=bugtraq&m=139905351928096&w=2
- lists.fedoraproject.org /pipermail/package-announce/2014-April/131221.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org /pipermail/package-announce/2014-April/131291.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org /pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136473.html
- marc.info /?l=bugtraq&m=139824993005633&w=2
- rhn.redhat.com /errata/RHSA-2014-0377.html
- marc.info /?l=bugtraq&m=139722163017074&w=2
- marc.info /?l=bugtraq&m=139889295732144&w=2
Other links (23)
- support.f5.com /kb/en-us/solutions/public/15000/100/sol15159.html?sr=36517217
- securitytracker.com /id/1030077
- seclists.org /fulldisclosure/2014/Apr/90
- getchef.com /blog/2014/04/09/chef-server-heartbleed-cve-2014-0160-releases/
- splunk.com /view/SP-CAAAMB3
- websense.com /support/article/kbarticle/Vulnerabilities-resolved-in-TRITON-APX-Version-8-0
Show 17 more
- apcmedia.com /salestools/SJHN-7RKGNM/SJHN-7RKGNM_R4_EN.pdf
- www-01.ibm.com /support/docview.wss?uid=swg21670161
- vmware.com /security/advisories/VMSA-2014-0012.html
- seclists.org /fulldisclosure/2014/Apr/109
- securitytracker.com /id/1030080
- www-01.ibm.com /support/docview.wss?uid=isg400001843
- securityfocus.com /bid/66690
- innominate.com /data/downloads/manuals/mdm_1.5.2.1_Release_Notes.pdf
- filezilla-project.org /versions.php?type=server
- kerio.com /support/kerio-control/release-history
- advisories.mageia.org /MGASA-2014-0165.html
- blackberry.com /btsc/KB35882
- securitytracker.com /id/1030081
- securityfocus.com /archive/1/534161/100/0/threaded
- bugzilla.redhat.com /show_bug.cgi?id=1084875
- www-01.ibm.com /support/docview.wss?uid=isg400001841
- securitytracker.com /id/1030079
Where the data on this page comes from
- CVE List (CVE.org): description, affected versions, references; CVE Terms of Use
- NVD: CVSS and CPE data
- CISA KEV catalog: exploitation, date added, due date
- CISA Vulnrichment (ADP): SSVC decision points
- FIRST EPSS: exploit probability and percentile
- Exploit-DB: published exploits
- Metasploit Framework: exploit and scanner modules
- PoC-in-GitHub: GitHub repositories that claim a proof of concept
Summary, impact and triage tags: written by our AI analysis pipeline from the sources above. Check them against the sources.
Similar CVEs
Get CVEs like this by email. Join the free digest: the CVEs we flag as major, all CVSS 8.0 or higher, in up to three emails a day (sent at 05:00, 11:00 and 15:00 UTC). Matching alerts to the products you run needs an account, and accounts are invite-only during the beta.