CVE-2026-53362
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: account for fraggap on the paged allocation path In __ip6_append_data(), when the paged-allocation branch is taken (MSG_MORE / NETIF_F_SG / large fraglen), alloclen and pagedlen are computed as alloclen = fragheaderlen + transhdrlen; pagedlen = datalen - transhdrlen; datalen already includes fraggap (datalen = length + fraggap). When fraggap is non-zero, this is not the first skb and transhdrlen is zero. The fraggap bytes carried over from the previous skb are copied just past the fragment headers in the new skb's linear area. The linear area is therefore undersized by fraggap bytes while pagedlen is overstated by the same amount, and the copy writes past skb->end into the trailing skb_shared_info. An unprivileged user can trigger this via a UDPv6 socket using MSG_MORE together with MSG_SPLICE_PAGES. The bad accounting was introduced by commit 773ba4fe9104 ("ipv6: avoid partial copy for zc"). Before commit ce650a166335 ("udp6: Fix __ip6_append_data()'s handling of MSG_SPLICE_PAGES"), the negative copy value caused -EINVAL to be returned. That later commit allowed MSG_SPLICE_PAGES to proceed in this case, making the corruption triggerable. The non-paged branch sets alloclen to fraglen, which already accounts for fraggap because datalen does. Bring the paged branch in line by adding fraggap to alloclen and subtracting it from pagedlen. After this adjustment, copy no longer collapses to -fraggap on the paged path, so remove the stale comment describing that old arithmetic. Since a negative copy is no longer expected for a valid MSG_SPLICE_PAGES case, remove the MSG_SPLICE_PAGES exception from the negative copy check.
do firstUpgrade to a fixed release: < 6.0, >= 6.1.177 and <= 6.1.*, >= 6.6.144 and <= 6.6.*, >= 6.12.95 and <= 6.12.* (+3 more below).
Can a WAF block it? No. The attack needs local access to the machine, so a WAF is not on its path.
Also consider: patch
Based on the attack vector (local or physical access). We check Cloudflare, AWS, Google Cloud Armor and Azure; for Akamai, Imperva, Fastly, F5, ask your vendor.
Is CVE-2026-53362 being exploited?
Yes. CVE-2026-53362 appears in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, which means exploitation in the wild has been confirmed and reported. Treat it as active rather than theoretical, and patch it ahead of higher-scoring vulnerabilities that carry no exploitation evidence.
How severe is CVE-2026-53362?
CVE-2026-53362 is rated High with a CVSS score of 7.8. Severity describes how bad exploitation would be, not how likely it is: pair it with exploitation evidence before deciding what to patch first.
Is there a patch for CVE-2026-53362?
Yes. A fix has been recorded for CVE-2026-53362. The vendor advisory is the authority on the exact fixed version — apply it from there rather than from a summary.
What does CVE-2026-53362 affect?
CVE-2026-53362 affects linux:linux_kernel, siemens:simatic_s7-1500_tm_mfp_firmware. Confirm the exact affected versions against the vendor advisory before deciding you are exposed.
Exploitation status reflects CISA's KEV catalog as we last synced it. Check the catalog directly.
- affected>= 773ba4fe9104a64a54d1c00f0fb6ffb95def2b03 and < 14200d435af9a9eeb444f529fc2f689a236b7962
- affected>= 773ba4fe9104a64a54d1c00f0fb6ffb95def2b03 and < 65fb14cbebb0cd0eff903a22d33537ddc8b95769
- affected>= 773ba4fe9104a64a54d1c00f0fb6ffb95def2b03 and < 46f201f8b4c39633a1fa3dc12459f506d470993d
- affected>= 773ba4fe9104a64a54d1c00f0fb6ffb95def2b03 and < 6374fb9edf72c67a118a2c214a0dddd04c921e0a
- affected>= 773ba4fe9104a64a54d1c00f0fb6ffb95def2b03 and < e9eacf19281ea2498b36291b56c9606118c2d74e
- affected>= 773ba4fe9104a64a54d1c00f0fb6ffb95def2b03 and < 736b380e28d0480c7bc3e022f1950f31fe53a7c5
- affected6.0
As published in the CVE Program record. A version outside these ranges is not a statement that it is unaffected — vendors sometimes understate a range, and distribution-backported builds carry upstream numbers that do not reflect what was patched into them.
public exploits
Unvetted proof-of-concept code on GitHub: 1 GitHub proof of concept
Listed so you can judge urgency, not as a recommendation to run anything. GitHub “proofs of concept” are unvetted: some are fake or carry malware. Exploit-DB marks the entries its staff verified.
cisa ssvc
- exploitation
- active
- automatable
- no
- technical impact
- total
Assessed by CISA 28 Aug 2026 (SSVC 2.0.3).
timeline
- 3 Jul 2026First proof-of-concept repository on GitHub (unvetted)
- 4 Jul 2026Published · 2 days later
- 27 Aug 2026Added to CISA KEV (exploited in the wild) · 53 days later
- 28 Aug 2026CISA SSVC assessment: exploitation active · 1 day later
- 30 Aug 2026CISA remediation due date (US federal agencies) · 2 days later
- 15 Oct 2026CVE record last updated · 46 days later
- 2 Nov 2026Analysed by vulneraibility.com · 19 days later
- Linkgit.kernel.org /stable/c/14200d435af9a9eeb444f529fc2f689a236b7962
- Linkgit.kernel.org /stable/c/65fb14cbebb0cd0eff903a22d33537ddc8b95769
- Linkgit.kernel.org /stable/c/46f201f8b4c39633a1fa3dc12459f506d470993d
- Linkgit.kernel.org /stable/c/6374fb9edf72c67a118a2c214a0dddd04c921e0a
- Linkgit.kernel.org /stable/c/e9eacf19281ea2498b36291b56c9606118c2d74e
- Linkgit.kernel.org /stable/c/736b380e28d0480c7bc3e022f1950f31fe53a7c5
- Linkcisa.gov /known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-53362
- Linkcert-portal.siemens.com /productcert/html/ssa-784472.html
sources
- CVE List (CVE.org): description, affected versions, references; CVE Terms of Use
- NVD: CVSS and CPE data
- CISA KEV catalog: exploitation, date added, due date
- CISA Vulnrichment (ADP): SSVC decision points
- FIRST EPSS: exploit probability and percentile
- PoC-in-GitHub: GitHub repositories that claim a proof of concept
- Summary, impact and triage tags: written by our AI analysis pipeline from the sources above. Check them against the sources.