Skip to content

CVE-2026-45585

Microsoft is aware of a security feature bypass vulnerability in Windows publicly referred to as "YellowKey". The proof of concept for this vulnerability has been made public violating coordinated vulnerability best practices. We are issuing this CVE to provide mitigation guidance that can be implemented to protect against this vulnerability until the security update is made available. Mitigation FAQs Should I leverage the temporary mitigation? Microsoft recommends that you consider implementing these mitigations if you are concerned your devices and data are at risk of being compromised or stolen. For example, if your organization’s employees take their work devices home or on business travel. What impact to service availability/management could be caused by implementing the mitigations? Implementing these mitigations will not impact service availability or management operations. Do customers need to revert the changes made to mitigate the vulnerability once the security update to protect against this vulnerability is available? No. The security update will maintain the mitigation's behavior once the security update is installed. I am using TPM+PIN, am I at risk of this vulnerability being exploited No, if you are using TPM+PIN the vulnerability is not exploitable.

CVSS
6.8Mediumscored by the publisher (CNA)
Exploited in the wild
Not knownUnvetted proof-of-concept code on GitHub; not in CISA KEV
EPSS
1.9%chance of exploitation in the next 30 daystop 21% of scored CVEsFIRST score of 11 Nov 2026
Fix
Patch availablesee the advisories in the references
Published
20 May 2026analysed here 12 Nov 2026

Summary

Triage

Attack surface
Server-side
Exploitable
At runtime
Attack vector
physical
Weakness
Can a WAF block it?
No. See why

The summary, impact and action text on this page are written by our AI analysis pipeline, or taken from the NVD description when a CVE was imported from NVD. They are not the vendor's wording: check them against the sources. A longer AI executive summary and technical analysis are generated for signed-in accounts on the Max plan.

Affected products

ProductAffected versions
Microsoft Windows 11 Version 24H2>= 10.0.26100.0 and < 10.0.26100.8655Vendor says fixed in: not stated
Microsoft Windows 11 Version 25H2>= 10.0.26200.0 and < 10.0.26200.8655Vendor says fixed in: not stated
Microsoft Windows 11 version 26H1>= 10.0.28000.0 and < 10.0.28000.2269Vendor says fixed in: not stated
Microsoft Windows Server 2025>= 10.0.26100.0 and < 10.0.26100.32995Vendor says fixed in: not stated
Microsoft Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)>= 10.0.26100.0 and < 10.0.26100.32995Vendor says fixed in: not stated

As published in the CVE Program record. A version outside these ranges is not a statement that it is unaffected — vendors sometimes understate a range, and distribution-backported builds carry upstream numbers that do not reflect what was patched into them.

Products named in our analysis

  • microsoft:windows_11_24h2
  • microsoft:windows_11_25h2
  • microsoft:windows_11_26h1
  • microsoft:windows_server_2025

Fix and mitigation

WAF and other mitigations

Can a WAF block it? No. The attack needs physical access to the machine, so a WAF is not on its path.

Also consider: input validation · RASP

Based on the attack vector (local or physical access). We check Cloudflare, AWS, Google Cloud Armor and Azure; for Akamai, Imperva, Fastly, F5, ask your vendor.

Remediation steps (AI-written)

Step-by-step remediation is generated for accounts on the Max plan, for CVEs that match a technology in their stack. Add this technology to your stack to see the fix checklist.

Exploitation evidence

CISA KEV catalog
Not listed as of our last sync.
Public exploit code
Unvetted proof-of-concept code on GitHub: 12 GitHub proofs of concept
CISA SSVC
exploitation poc, automatable no, technical impact totalAssessed by CISA 20 May 2026 (SSVC 2.0.3). Exploitation is none, poc (public proof of concept) or active.

Listed so you can judge urgency, not as a recommendation to run anything. GitHub “proofs of concept” are unvetted: some are fake or carry malware. Exploit-DB marks the entries its staff verified.

Timeline

  1. 20 May 2026First proof-of-concept repository on GitHub (unvetted)
  2. 20 May 2026CISA SSVC assessment: exploitation pocsame day later
  3. 20 May 2026Publishedsame day later
  4. 10 Aug 2026CVE record last updated83 days (about 3 months) later
  5. 12 Nov 2026Analysed by vulneraibility.com94 days (about 3 months) later

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

MetricValueWhat it means
Attack vectorPhysicalRequires physical contact with the hardware.
Attack complexityLowRepeatable attack, no special conditions.
Privileges requiredNoneThe attacker needs no prior access.
User interactionNoneNo victim action needed.
ScopeUnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
ConfidentialityHighTotal data disclosure possible.
IntegrityHighComplete modification possible.
AvailabilityHighFull outage possible.

Common questions

Is CVE-2026-45585 being exploited?

Not confirmed. CVE-2026-45585 does not appear in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, which records only exploitation that has been observed and reported publicly. That is evidence of absence of a report, not evidence the flaw is unattacked. EPSS currently estimates a 1.9% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.

How severe is CVE-2026-45585?

CVE-2026-45585 is rated Medium with a CVSS score of 6.8. Severity describes how bad exploitation would be, not how likely it is: pair it with exploitation evidence before deciding what to patch first.

Is there a patch for CVE-2026-45585?

Yes. A fix has been recorded for CVE-2026-45585. The vendor advisory is the authority on the exact fixed version — apply it from there rather than from a summary.

What does CVE-2026-45585 affect?

CVE-2026-45585 affects microsoft:windows_11_24h2, microsoft:windows_11_25h2, microsoft:windows_11_26h1, microsoft:windows_server_2025. Confirm the exact affected versions against the vendor advisory before deciding you are exposed.

Exploitation status reflects CISA's KEV catalog as we last synced it. Check the catalog directly.

References

NVDCVE.orgCVE DetailsSource

2 references in the CVE record, grouped by the tags the record gives them.

Patches (1)

Exploits (1)

Where the data on this page comes from

Summary, impact and triage tags: written by our AI analysis pipeline from the sources above. Check them against the sources.

Similar CVEs

Get CVEs like this by email. Join the free digest: the CVEs we flag as major, all CVSS 8.0 or higher, in up to three emails a day (sent at 05:00, 11:00 and 15:00 UTC). Matching alerts to the products you run needs an account, and accounts are invite-only during the beta.

© 2026 vulneraibility.com