CVE-2026-23111
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_tables: fix inverted genmask check in nft_map_catchall_activate() nft_map_catchall_activate() has an inverted element activity check compared to its non-catchall counterpart nft_mapelem_activate() and compared to what is logically required. nft_map_catchall_activate() is called from the abort path to re-activate catchall map elements that were deactivated during a failed transaction. It should skip elements that are already active (they don't need re-activation) and process elements that are inactive (they need to be restored). Instead, the current code does the opposite: it skips inactive elements and processes active ones. Compare the non-catchall activate callback, which is correct: nft_mapelem_activate(): if (nft_set_elem_active(ext, iter->genmask)) return 0; /* skip active, process inactive */ With the buggy catchall version: nft_map_catchall_activate(): if (!nft_set_elem_active(ext, genmask)) continue; /* skip inactive, process active */ The consequence is that when a DELSET operation is aborted, nft_setelem_data_activate() is never called for the catchall element. For NFT_GOTO verdict elements, this means nft_data_hold() is never called to restore the chain->use reference count. Each abort cycle permanently decrements chain->use. Once chain->use reaches zero, DELCHAIN succeeds and frees the chain while catchall verdict elements still reference it, resulting in a use-after-free. This is exploitable for local privilege escalation from an unprivileged user via user namespaces + nftables on distributions that enable CONFIG_USER_NS and CONFIG_NF_TABLES. Fix by removing the negation so the check matches nft_mapelem_activate(): skip active elements, process inactive ones.
- CVSS
- 7.8Highscored by the publisher (CNA)
- Exploited in the wild
- Not knownUnvetted proof-of-concept code on GitHub; not in CISA KEV
- EPSS
- 1.1%chance of exploitation in the next 30 daystop 34% of scored CVEsFIRST score of 11 Nov 2026
- Fix
- Fixed in < 6.4, >= 5.15.200 and <= 5.15.*, >= 6.1.163 and <= 6.1.*per the vendor; 4 more listed below
- Published
- 13 Feb 2026analysed here 12 Nov 2026
Do first. Upgrade to a fixed release: < 6.4, >= 5.15.200 and <= 5.15.*, >= 6.1.163 and <= 6.1.*, >= 6.6.124 and <= 6.6.* (and 3 more below).
Summary
Triage
- Attack surface
- Server-side
- Exploitable
- At runtime
- Attack vector
- local
- Can a WAF block it?
- No. See why
The summary, impact and action text on this page are written by our AI analysis pipeline, or taken from the NVD description when a CVE was imported from NVD. They are not the vendor's wording: check them against the sources. A longer AI executive summary and technical analysis are generated for signed-in accounts on the Max plan.
Affected products
| Product | Affected versions | Vendor says fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | >= 25aa2ad37c2162be1c0bc4fe6397f7e4c13f00f8 and < 8c760ba4e36c750379d13569f23f5a6e185333f5>= d60be2da67d172aecf866302c91ea11533eca4d9 and < b9b6573421de51829f7ec1cce76d85f5f6fbbd7f>= 628bd3e49cba1c066228e23d71a852c23e26da73 and < 42c574c1504aa089a0a142e4c13859327570473d>= 628bd3e49cba1c066228e23d71a852c23e26da73 and < 1444ff890b4653add12f734ffeffc173d42862dd>= 628bd3e49cba1c066228e23d71a852c23e26da73 and < 8b68a45f9722f2babe9e7bad00aa74638addf081>= 628bd3e49cba1c066228e23d71a852c23e26da73 and < f41c5d151078c5348271ffaf8e7410d96f2d82f8bc9f791d2593f17e39f87c6e2b3a36549a3705b13c7ec098e3b588434a8b07ea9b5b36f04cef1f50a136b7942ad2a50de708f76ea299ccb45ac7a7f9dc7cdf8cbcbf8b13de1df93f356ec04cdeef5c41>= 5.15.121 and < 5.15.200>= 6.1.36 and < 6.1.163>= 4.19.316 and < 4.20>= 5.4.262 and < 5.5>= 5.10.188 and < 5.11>= 6.3.10 and < 6.46.4Vendor says fixed in: < 6.4, >= 5.15.200 and <= 5.15.*, >= 6.1.163 and <= 6.1.*, >= 6.6.124 and <= 6.6.*, >= 6.12.70 and <= 6.12.*, >= 6.18.10 and <= 6.18.*, >= 6.19 and <= * |
As published in the CVE Program record. A version outside these ranges is not a statement that it is unaffected — vendors sometimes understate a range, and distribution-backported builds carry upstream numbers that do not reflect what was patched into them.
Products named in our analysis
- linux:linux_kernel
Fix and mitigation
WAF and other mitigations
Can a WAF block it? No. The attack needs local access to the machine, so a WAF is not on its path.
Also consider: patch
Based on the attack vector (local or physical access). We check Cloudflare, AWS, Google Cloud Armor and Azure; for Akamai, Imperva, Fastly, F5, ask your vendor.
Remediation steps (AI-written)
Step-by-step remediation is generated for accounts on the Max plan, for CVEs that match a technology in their stack. Add this technology to your stack to see the fix checklist.
Exploitation evidence
- CISA KEV catalog
- Not listed as of our last sync.
- Public exploit code
- Unvetted proof-of-concept code on GitHub: 10 GitHub proofs of concept
- CISA SSVC
- exploitation none, automatable no, technical impact totalAssessed by CISA 9 Jun 2026 (SSVC 2.0.3). Exploitation is none, poc (public proof of concept) or active.
GitHub proofs of concept
- Knz-source/CVE-2026-23111-POC-noddlenpottato10 stars
- Baba01hacker666/CVE-2026-231117 stars
- 0xBlackash/CVE-2026-231115 stars
- kinokopio/CVE-2026-231115 stars
and 6 more repositories
Listed so you can judge urgency, not as a recommendation to run anything. GitHub “proofs of concept” are unvetted: some are fake or carry malware. Exploit-DB marks the entries its staff verified.
Timeline
- 13 Feb 2026Published
- 9 Jun 2026First proof-of-concept repository on GitHub (unvetted)115 days (about 4 months) later
- 9 Jun 2026CISA SSVC assessment: exploitation none1 day later
- 15 Oct 2026CVE record last updated128 days (about 4 months) later
- 12 Nov 2026Analysed by vulneraibility.com28 days later
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
| Metric | Value | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Attack vector | LocalLocal access required (shell, logged-in user). | Local access required (shell, logged-in user). |
| Attack complexity | LowRepeatable attack, no special conditions. | Repeatable attack, no special conditions. |
| Privileges required | LowThe attacker needs basic user privileges. | The attacker needs basic user privileges. |
| User interaction | NoneNo victim action needed. | No victim action needed. |
| Scope | UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component. | Impact stays within the vulnerable component. |
| Confidentiality | HighTotal data disclosure possible. | Total data disclosure possible. |
| Integrity | HighComplete modification possible. | Complete modification possible. |
| Availability | HighFull outage possible. | Full outage possible. |
Common questions
Is CVE-2026-23111 being exploited?
Not confirmed. CVE-2026-23111 does not appear in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, which records only exploitation that has been observed and reported publicly. That is evidence of absence of a report, not evidence the flaw is unattacked. EPSS currently estimates a 1.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.
How severe is CVE-2026-23111?
CVE-2026-23111 is rated High with a CVSS score of 7.8. Severity describes how bad exploitation would be, not how likely it is: pair it with exploitation evidence before deciding what to patch first.
Is there a patch for CVE-2026-23111?
Yes. A fix has been recorded for CVE-2026-23111. The vendor advisory is the authority on the exact fixed version — apply it from there rather than from a summary.
What does CVE-2026-23111 affect?
CVE-2026-23111 affects linux:linux_kernel. Confirm the exact affected versions against the vendor advisory before deciding you are exposed.
Exploitation status reflects CISA's KEV catalog as we last synced it. Check the catalog directly.
References
21 references in the CVE record, grouped by the tags the record gives them.
Advisories (7)
- access.redhat.com /errata/RHSA-2026:10996
- access.redhat.com /errata/RHSA-2026:18134
- access.redhat.com /errata/RHSA-2026:10108
- access.redhat.com /errata/RHSA-2026:9112
- access.redhat.com /errata/RHSA-2026:6570
- access.redhat.com /errata/RHSA-2026:62639
Show 1 more
- access.redhat.com /errata/RHSA-2026:62641
Other links (14)
- git.kernel.org /stable/c/8c760ba4e36c750379d13569f23f5a6e185333f5
- git.kernel.org /stable/c/b9b6573421de51829f7ec1cce76d85f5f6fbbd7f
- git.kernel.org /stable/c/42c574c1504aa089a0a142e4c13859327570473d
- git.kernel.org /stable/c/1444ff890b4653add12f734ffeffc173d42862dd
- git.kernel.org /stable/c/8b68a45f9722f2babe9e7bad00aa74638addf081
- git.kernel.org /stable/c/f41c5d151078c5348271ffaf8e7410d96f2d82f8
Show 8 more
- cert-portal.siemens.com /productcert/html/ssa-082556.html
- cert-portal.siemens.com /productcert/html/ssa-253495.html
- cert-portal.siemens.com /productcert/html/ssa-019113.html
- cert-portal.siemens.com /productcert/html/ssa-457936.html
- blog.exodusintel.com /2026/06/08/off-by-exploiting-a-use-after-free-in-the-linux-kernel/
- access.redhat.com /security/cve/CVE-2026-23111
- bugzilla.redhat.com /show_bug.cgi?id=2439687
- security.access.redhat.com /data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-23111.json
Where the data on this page comes from
- CVE List (CVE.org): description, affected versions, references; CVE Terms of Use
- NVD: CVSS and CPE data
- CISA Vulnrichment (ADP): SSVC decision points
- FIRST EPSS: exploit probability and percentile
- PoC-in-GitHub: GitHub repositories that claim a proof of concept
Summary, impact and triage tags: written by our AI analysis pipeline from the sources above. Check them against the sources.
Similar CVEs
Get CVEs like this by email. Join the free digest: the CVEs we flag as major, all CVSS 8.0 or higher, in up to three emails a day (sent at 05:00, 11:00 and 15:00 UTC). Matching alerts to the products you run needs an account, and accounts are invite-only during the beta.