CVE-2023-27163

request-baskets up to v1.2.1 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /api/baskets/{name}. This vulnerability allows attackers to access network resources and sensitive information via a crafted API request.

CVSS: 6.5Mediumscored by CISA
Exploited in the wild: Not knownUnvetted proof-of-concept code on GitHub; not in CISA KEV
EPSS: 6.5%chance of exploitation in the next 30 daystop 7% of scored CVEsFIRST score of 11 Nov 2026
Fix: Not stated by the vendorno fixed release in the CVE record
Published: 31 Mar 2023analysed here 12 Nov 2026

Summary

Triage

Attack surface: Server-side
Exploitable: At runtime
Attack vector: network
Weakness: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Can a WAF block it?: Partly. See why

The summary, impact and action text on this page are written by our AI analysis pipeline, or taken from the NVD description when a CVE was imported from NVD. They are not the vendor's wording: check them against the sources. A longer AI executive summary and technical analysis are generated for signed-in accounts on the Max plan.

Affected products

Products named in our analysis

rbaskets:request_baskets

Fix and mitigation

WAF and other mitigations

Can a WAF block it? Partly. SSRF makes the server call a URL the attacker picks. A WAF can block well-known targets such as cloud metadata addresses, but not every internal host.

Also consider: egress filter · IMDSv2

Based on the weakness type only; no CVE-specific evidence yet. We check Cloudflare, AWS, Google Cloud Armor and Azure; for Akamai, Imperva, Fastly, F5, ask your vendor.

Remediation steps (AI-written)

Step-by-step remediation is generated for accounts on the Max plan, for CVEs that match a technology in their stack. Add this technology to your stack to see the fix checklist.

Exploitation evidence

CISA KEV catalog: Not listed as of our last sync.
Public exploit code: Unvetted proof-of-concept code on GitHub: 24 GitHub proofs of concept · 1 Nuclei template
CISA SSVC: exploitation poc, automatable no, technical impact totalAssessed by CISA 18 Feb 2025 (SSVC 2.0.3). Exploitation is none, poc (public proof of concept) or active.

Nuclei

Request-Baskets <= 1.2.1 - Server Side Request Forgerydetection template, medium

GitHub proofs of concept

entr0pie/CVE-2023-2716332 stars
samh4cks/CVE-2023-27163-InternalProber5 stars
seanrdev/cve-2023-271634 stars
hhesenjan/CVE-2023-27163-AND-Mailtrail-v0.532 stars

and 20 more repositories

Listed so you can judge urgency, not as a recommendation to run anything. GitHub “proofs of concept” are unvetted: some are fake or carry malware. Exploit-DB marks the entries its staff verified.

Timeline

31 Mar 2023Published
11 Jul 2023First proof-of-concept repository on GitHub (unvetted)101 days (about 3 months) later
18 Feb 2025CISA SSVC assessment: exploitation poc589 days (about 2 years) later
9 Jul 2026CVE record last updated505 days (about 1 year) later
12 Nov 2026Analysed by vulneraibility.com127 days (about 4 months) later

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Metric	Value	What it means
Attack vector	NetworkReachable over the internet or any routable network.	Reachable over the internet or any routable network.
Attack complexity	LowRepeatable attack, no special conditions.	Repeatable attack, no special conditions.
Privileges required	HighThe attacker needs admin-level privileges.	The attacker needs admin-level privileges.
User interaction	NoneNo victim action needed.	No victim action needed.
Scope	UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.	Impact stays within the vulnerable component.
Confidentiality	HighTotal data disclosure possible.	Total data disclosure possible.
Integrity	HighComplete modification possible.	Complete modification possible.
Availability	NoneThe service stays up.	The service stays up.

Common questions

Is CVE-2023-27163 being exploited?

Not confirmed. CVE-2023-27163 does not appear in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, which records only exploitation that has been observed and reported publicly. That is evidence of absence of a report, not evidence the flaw is unattacked. EPSS currently estimates a 6.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.

How severe is CVE-2023-27163?

CVE-2023-27163 is rated Medium with a CVSS score of 6.5. Severity describes how bad exploitation would be, not how likely it is: pair it with exploitation evidence before deciding what to patch first.

Is there a patch for CVE-2023-27163?

Not known from our data. No patch reference has been recorded for CVE-2023-27163, which is not the same as no patch existing — a fix may have shipped without a tagged reference, or after this record was written. The vendor advisory is the only authority on whether a fix exists, and mitigations may be available regardless.

What does CVE-2023-27163 affect?

CVE-2023-27163 affects rbaskets:request_baskets. Confirm the exact affected versions against the vendor advisory before deciding you are exposed.

Exploitation status reflects CISA's KEV catalog as we last synced it. Check the catalog directly.

References

NVD CVE.org CVE Details Source

5 references in the CVE record, grouped by the tags the record gives them.

Where the data on this page comes from

CVE List (CVE.org): description, affected versions, references; CVE Terms of Use
NVD: CVSS and CPE data
CISA Vulnrichment (ADP): SSVC decision points
FIRST EPSS: exploit probability and percentile
Nuclei templates: detection templates
PoC-in-GitHub: GitHub repositories that claim a proof of concept

Summary, impact and triage tags: written by our AI analysis pipeline from the sources above. Check them against the sources.

Similar CVEs

Get CVEs like this by email. Join the free digest: the CVEs we flag as major, all CVSS 8.0 or higher, in up to three emails a day (sent at 05:00, 11:00 and 15:00 UTC). Matching alerts to the products you run needs an account, and accounts are invite-only during the beta.