Skip to content

CVE-2020-9484

When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed.

CVSS
7.0High
Exploited in the wild
Not knownUnvetted proof-of-concept code on GitHub; not in CISA KEV
EPSS
55.5%chance of exploitation in the next 30 daystop 1% of scored CVEsFIRST score of 11 Nov 2026
Fix
Patch availablesee the advisories in the references
Published
20 May 2020analysed here 12 Nov 2026

Summary

Triage

Attack surface
Server-side
Exploitable
At runtime
Attack vector
local
Weakness
Can a WAF block it?
No. See why

The summary, impact and action text on this page are written by our AI analysis pipeline, or taken from the NVD description when a CVE was imported from NVD. They are not the vendor's wording: check them against the sources. A longer AI executive summary and technical analysis are generated for signed-in accounts on the Max plan.

Affected products

ProductAffected versions
Apache TomcatApache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54, 7.0.0 to 7.0.103Vendor says fixed in: not stated

As published in the CVE Program record. A version outside these ranges is not a statement that it is unaffected — vendors sometimes understate a range, and distribution-backported builds carry upstream numbers that do not reflect what was patched into them.

Products named in our analysis

  • apache:tomcat
  • debian:debian_linux
  • opensuse:leap
  • fedoraproject:fedora
  • canonical:ubuntu_linux
  • oracle:agile_engineering_data_management
  • oracle:agile_product_lifecycle_management
  • oracle:communications_cloud_native_core_binding_support_function
  • oracle:communications_cloud_native_core_policy
  • oracle:communications_diameter_signaling_router
  • oracle:communications_element_manager
  • oracle:communications_instant_messaging_server
  • oracle:communications_session_report_manager
  • oracle:communications_session_route_manager
  • oracle:database
  • oracle:fmw_platform
  • oracle:hospitality_guest_access
  • oracle:instantis_enterprisetrack
  • oracle:managed_file_transfer
  • oracle:mysql_enterprise_monitor
  • oracle:retail_order_broker
  • oracle:siebel_apps_-_marketing
  • oracle:siebel_ui_framework
  • oracle:transportation_management
  • oracle:workload_manager
  • mcafee:epolicy_orchestrator

Fix and mitigation

WAF and other mitigations

Can a WAF block it? No. The attack needs local access to the machine, so a WAF is not on its path.

Also consider: allow-list classes · patch

Based on the attack vector (local or physical access). We check Cloudflare, AWS, Google Cloud Armor and Azure; for Akamai, Imperva, Fastly, F5, ask your vendor.

Remediation steps (AI-written)

Step-by-step remediation is generated for accounts on the Max plan, for CVEs that match a technology in their stack. Add this technology to your stack to see the fix checklist.

Exploitation evidence

CISA KEV catalog
Not listed as of our last sync.
Public exploit code
Unvetted proof-of-concept code on GitHub: 17 GitHub proofs of concept · 1 Nuclei template
CISA SSVC
exploitation none, automatable no, technical impact totalAssessed by CISA 8 Oct 2026 (SSVC 2.0.3). Exploitation is none, poc (public proof of concept) or active.

Nuclei

GitHub proofs of concept

and 13 more repositories

Listed so you can judge urgency, not as a recommendation to run anything. GitHub “proofs of concept” are unvetted: some are fake or carry malware. Exploit-DB marks the entries its staff verified.

Timeline

  1. 19 May 2020First proof-of-concept repository on GitHub (unvetted)
  2. 20 May 2020Published2 days later
  3. 8 Oct 2026CISA SSVC assessment: exploitation none2,332 days (about 6 years) later
  4. 8 Oct 2026CVE record last updatedsame day later
  5. 12 Nov 2026Analysed by vulneraibility.com35 days later

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

MetricValueWhat it means
Attack vectorLocalLocal access required (shell, logged-in user).
Attack complexityHighNeeds specific conditions, a race or a particular configuration.
Privileges requiredLowThe attacker needs basic user privileges.
User interactionNoneNo victim action needed.
ScopeUnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
ConfidentialityHighTotal data disclosure possible.
IntegrityHighComplete modification possible.
AvailabilityHighFull outage possible.

Common questions

Is CVE-2020-9484 being exploited?

Not confirmed. CVE-2020-9484 does not appear in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, which records only exploitation that has been observed and reported publicly. That is evidence of absence of a report, not evidence the flaw is unattacked. EPSS currently estimates a 56% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.

How severe is CVE-2020-9484?

CVE-2020-9484 is rated High with a CVSS score of 7.0. Severity describes how bad exploitation would be, not how likely it is: pair it with exploitation evidence before deciding what to patch first.

Is there a patch for CVE-2020-9484?

Yes. A fix has been recorded for CVE-2020-9484. The vendor advisory is the authority on the exact fixed version — apply it from there rather than from a summary.

What does CVE-2020-9484 affect?

CVE-2020-9484 affects apache:tomcat, debian:debian_linux, opensuse:leap, fedoraproject:fedora, and 22 further products or versions. Confirm the exact affected versions against the vendor advisory before deciding you are exposed.

Exploitation status reflects CISA's KEV catalog as we last synced it. Check the catalog directly.

References

NVDCVE.orgCVE DetailsSource

42 references in the CVE record, grouped by the tags the record gives them.

Advisories (7)

Show 1 more

Other links (35)

Show 29 more
  • lists.apache.org /thread.html/rb1c0fb105ce2b93b7ec6fc1b77dd208022621a91c12d1f580813cfed%40%3Cdev.
  • lists.debian.org /debian-lts-announce/2020/07/msg00010.html
  • oracle.com /security-alerts/cpujul2020.html
  • lists.apache.org /thread.html/r77eae567ed829da9012cadb29af17f2df8fa23bf66faf88229857bb1%40%3Canno
  • security.netapp.com /advisory/ntap-20200528-0005/
  • packetstormsecurity.com /files/157924/Apache-Tomcat-CVE-2020-9484-Proof-Of-Concept.html
  • lists.apache.org /thread.html/r123b3ebe389f46f9d337923f393cdae4d3e9b78d982d706712f0898c%40%3Ccomm
  • lists.apache.org /thread.html/raa4123e472175bb052fbba165d37187cea923f755e8f3f30d124cb3f%40%3Ccomm
  • lists.apache.org /thread.html/rc8473b08abdf3c16494ed817bec1717a0ee0c8080315bc27db5f21c3%40%3Ccomm
  • lists.apache.org /thread.html/rf59c72572b9fee674a5d5cc6afeca4ffc3918a02c354a81cc50b7119%40%3Ccomm
  • oracle.com /security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html
  • kc.mcafee.com /corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10332
  • oracle.com /security-alerts/cpujan2021.html
  • lists.apache.org /thread.html/rfe62fbf9d4c314f166fe8c668e50e5d9dd882a99447f26f0367474bf%40%3Cdev.
  • lists.apache.org /thread.html/rfe62fbf9d4c314f166fe8c668e50e5d9dd882a99447f26f0367474bf%40%3Canno
  • lists.apache.org /thread.html/rfe62fbf9d4c314f166fe8c668e50e5d9dd882a99447f26f0367474bf%40%3Cuser
  • lists.apache.org /thread.html/rf6d5d57b114678d8898005faef31e9fd6d7c981fcc4ccfc3bc272fc9%40%3Cdev.
  • lists.apache.org /thread.html/rfe62fbf9d4c314f166fe8c668e50e5d9dd882a99447f26f0367474bf%40%3Canno
  • openwall.com /lists/oss-security/2021/03/01/2
  • lists.apache.org /thread.html/r8dd19c514face6dd85fd4eab0271854883f40c7307926c1f7cd5400c%40%3Ccomm
  • oracle.com /security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html
  • lists.apache.org /thread.html/r8a2ac0e476dbfc1e6440b09dcc782d444ad635d6da26f0284725a5dc%40%3Cuser
  • lists.apache.org /thread.html/rb51ccd58b2152fc75125b2406fc93e04ca9d34e737263faa6ff0f41f%40%3Cuser
  • lists.apache.org /thread.html/r11ce01e8a4c7269b88f88212f21830edf73558997ac7744f37769b77%40%3Cuser
  • lists.apache.org /thread.html/rc1778b38e74b5b6142414d57623bd55b023a72361f422836782fca3c%40%3Cdev.
  • oracle.com //security-alerts/cpujul2021.html
  • oracle.com /security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html
  • oracle.com /security-alerts/cpujan2022.html
  • oracle.com /security-alerts/cpujul2022.html

Where the data on this page comes from

Summary, impact and triage tags: written by our AI analysis pipeline from the sources above. Check them against the sources.

Similar CVEs

Get CVEs like this by email. Join the free digest: the CVEs we flag as major, all CVSS 8.0 or higher, in up to three emails a day (sent at 05:00, 11:00 and 15:00 UTC). Matching alerts to the products you run needs an account, and accounts are invite-only during the beta.

© 2026 vulneraibility.com